4.6 Article

A General Improvement in the WENO-Z-Type Schemes

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 1362-1401

出版社

GLOBAL SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.OA-2021-0202

关键词

WENO-Z-type schemes; locally order-preserving mapping; hyperbolic problems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study extends the order-preserving criterion to the WENO-Z type schemes, proposing the improved LOPGMWENO-X schemes through the concept of locally order-preserving mapping. The advantages of these schemes include fixing oscillation issues, maintaining high resolutions, increasing resolution in smooth wave regions, and reducing post-shock oscillations.
A new type of finite volume WENO schemes for hyperbolic problems was devised in [33] by introducing the order-preserving (OP) criterion. In this continuing work, we extend the OP criterion to the WENO-Z-type schemes. We firstly rewrite the formulas of the Z-type weights in a uniform form from a mapping perspective inspired by extensive numerical observations. Accordingly, we build the concept of the locally order-preserving (LOP) mapping which is an extension of the order-preserving (OP) mapping and the resultant improved WENO-Z-type schemes are denoted as LOPGMWENO-X. There are four major advantages of the LOP-GMWENO-X schemes superior to the existing WENO-Z-type schemes. Firstly, the new schemes can amend the serious drawback of the existing WENO-Z-type schemes that most of them suffer from either producing severe spurious oscillations or failing to obtain high resolutions in long calculations of hyperbolic problems with discontinuities. Secondly, they can maintain considerably high resolutions on solving problems with high-order critical points at long output times. Thirdly, they can obtain evidently higher resolution in the region with high-frequency but smooth waves. Finally, they can significantly decrease the post-shock oscillations for simulations of some 2D problems with strong shock waves. Extensive benchmark examples are conducted to illustrate these advantages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据