4.7 Article

Lift-off characteristics of non-premixed jet flames in laminar/turbulent transition

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 238, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111948

关键词

Non-premixed flame; Lifted flame; Laminar to turbulent; Similarity solutions; Mixing core; Stabilization regime

资金

  1. [2021 (N11210060)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study estimated lift-off heights of lifted flames based on variations in fuel tube diameter, fuel jet velocity, and methane/propane proportions, with improved flow rate relationships proposed in external mixing and fully turbulent regimes. The blowout mechanism was explained using turbulent intensity, and an overall diagram showing various stabilization mechanisms of lifted flames was presented.
The stabilization mechanism of a laminar lifted flame has been explained theoretically. However, variation of the stabilization mechanism of the lifted flame in the transitional regime between laminar and turbulent flames has not been clarified. In this study, lift-off heights were estimated in relation to variation of the fuel tube diameter, fuel jet velocity, and proportions of methane and propane. With increase of the fuel jet velocity, stable lifted flames could be obtained under various conditions and the soot emission reduced. The stabilization mechanisms were explained based on the concepts of laminar and turbulent mixing cores. These were classified into five regimes: laminar similarity, laminar near-core, external mixing, transitional, and fully turbulent. Improved relationships between the flow rate and the lift-off height were proposed in two regimes (external mixing regime and the fully turbulent one). In addition, the blowout mechanism was explained using the turbulent intensity. Finally, an overall stabilization diagram showing the various stabilization mechanisms of the lifted flames was presented. (c) 2021 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据