4.6 Article

Synthesis of a porous amidoxime modified hypercrosslinked benzil polymer and efficient uranium extraction from water

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128508

关键词

Benzil; Hypercrosslinked polymer; Amidoxime; Uranium; Water

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2021ME114]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [3072021CFT1004]
  3. University and Local Integration Development Project of Yantai, China [2020 XDRHXMPT36]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a highly efficient adsorbent HCP-AO was synthesized, which exhibited high adsorption capacity, selectivity, and recyclability for uranium extraction from water.
Benzil was hypercrosslinked to produce a novel hypercrosslinked porous organic polymer skeleton (HCP-CO) with an ultrahigh Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area of 605.4 m(2)& BULL;g(-1). The skeleton was grafted with diaminomaleonitrile (DAMN) via a simple Schiff base reaction, and then reacted with hydroxylamine hydrochloride (NH2OH & BULL;HCl) to produce an amidoxime-modified hypercrosslinked benzil polymer (HCP-AO) possessing many amidoxime groups. The chelation of the amidoxime group and uranium (VI) and porous structure provided HCPAO with excellent adsorption performance. The maximum adsorption capacity for the uranium of HCP-AO can reach 370.9 mg & BULL;g(-1) at pH = 6. Moreover, the adsorption process agreed well with the Langmuir and pseudo second-order models, thus indicating it was monolayer chemical adsorption. HCP-AO demonstrated excellent selectivity and recyclability; furthermore, the removal rate for uranium still remained at 66.35% in the coexistence of metal ions in simulated seawater. Furthermore, after five adsorption-desorption cycles, the adsorption capacity of HCP-AO slightly reduced. To summarize, we synthesized an efficient adsorbent that possesses high adsorption capacity, selectivity, and recyclability; it has good potential for uranium extraction from water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据