4.3 Review

Dopamine as a Potential Target for Learning and Memory: Contributing to Related Neurological Disorders

期刊

CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 558-576

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL
DOI: 10.2174/1871527321666220418115503

关键词

Dopamine; dopamine receptor; synaptic plasticity; learning; memory; neurological disorders

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article summarizes the importance of dopamine in learning and memory, particularly its role in spatial learning and memory. Through the study of dopamine system signaling, it explores the relationship between dopamine and various types of memory, such as reward signaling, working memory, long-term plasticity, and memory consolidation. It also analyzes memory impairment in dopamine-related neurological disorders.
It is well established that learning and memory are complex processes. They involve and recruit different brain modulatory neurotransmitter systems. Considerable evidence points to the involvement of dopamine (DA) in learning and memory. Manifestations of the synaptic spatial localization of the effect of DA have gained a great deal of interest. Despite the molecular cloning of the five DA receptor subtypes, the underlying signaling of the DA receptors in spatial learning and memory is less compelling. Fluctuations in the DA level in the brain are associated with many diseases that comprise deficits in learning and memory, including Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease. This review aims to briefly summarize existing information regarding the memory performance modified by DA. The signaling of the DA system, particularly examining the origin of DA-modulated memory, is also discussed. Then, several kinds of memories in which DA plays a critical role, including reward signaling, working memory, and long-term plasticity, as well as memory consolidation, are also described. Finally, memory impairment in some DA-related neurological disorders is also examined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据