4.4 Article

Gonococcal arthritis: case series of 58 hospital cases

期刊

CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 41, 期 9, 页码 2855-2862

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-022-06208-w

关键词

Bacterial arthritis; Gonococcus; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Tenosynovitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gonococcal arthritis (GA) is rare but important to diagnose early and treat promptly to prevent joint destruction. Use of PCR in joint puncture is useful in cases with negative culture.
Objectives Extra-genital manifestations of gonococcal infection are rare (0.5-3%). Among them, gonococcal arthritis (GA) is the most frequent, accounting for 30-90% of disseminated infections. Our study aimed to describe all hospital cases of GA in Reunion Island, a French overseas territory. Methods We conducted a retrospective, multicentric, observational study of all cases of certain, probable or possible GA from 2008 to 2020. Results We identified 58 cases of GA, mostly certain cases (n=48). Sex ratio was balanced, but men were older than women (51 vs 27 years, p < 0.001). A total of 41% had travelled abroad during the previous 3 months, mostly in Madagascar or South-East Asia. The most frequently infected joint was the knee, followed by ankle, wrist and fingers or carpal joints. Only 16% of cases had genital symptoms, but 50% had another extra-genital manifestation, mainly skin lesions (40%). Positivity rate of joint puncture was 91%, with a purulent liquid. Only 58% had a positive culture, and 33% had only a positive PCR. There was no 3GC-resistant strain. In comparison with gonococcal infection without arthritis, patients were older and had fewer genital but more extra-genital symptoms. On discharge 60% had persistent articular symptoms. GA represented 18% of all hospitalised septic arthritis cases with microbial identification in 2019. Conclusions GA is rare but it is important to make an early diagnosis and treat promptly, as joint destruction may be important, leading to persistent symptoms after discharge. PCR use in joint puncture is useful in cases with negative culture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据