4.2 Review

Artificial intelligence to classify ear disease from otoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 401-413

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/coa.13925

关键词

artificial intelligence; computer vision; diagnosis; machine learning; otoscopy

资金

  1. Garnett Passe and Rodney Williams Memorial Foundation
  2. Avant Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Artificial intelligence computer vision algorithms can accurately classify ear diseases from otoscopy. Convolutional neural networks achieve the highest accuracy among classification methods. A comprehensive and reliable otoscopy database is crucial for algorithm training.
Objectives To summarise the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) computer vision algorithms to classify ear disease from otoscopy. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Using the PRISMA guidelines, nine online databases were searched for articles that used AI computer vision algorithms developed from various methods (convolutional neural networks, artificial neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees and k-nearest neighbours) to classify otoscopic images. Diagnostic classes of interest: normal tympanic membrane, acute otitis media (AOM), otitis media with effusion (OME), chronic otitis media (COM) with or without perforation, cholesteatoma and canal obstruction. Main outcome measures Accuracy to correctly classify otoscopic images compared to otolaryngologists (ground truth). The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Version 2 tool was used to assess the quality of methodology and risk of bias. Results Thirty-nine articles were included. Algorithms achieved 90.7% (95%CI: 90.1-91.3%) accuracy to difference between normal or abnormal otoscopy images in 14 studies. The most common multiclassification algorithm (3 or more diagnostic classes) achieved 97.6% (95%CI: 97.3-97.9%) accuracy to differentiate between normal, AOM and OME in three studies. AI algorithms outperformed human assessors to classify otoscopy images achieving 93.4% (95%CI: 90.5-96.4%) versus 73.2% (95%CI: 67.9-78.5%) accuracy in three studies. Convolutional neural networks achieved the highest accuracy compared to other classification methods. Conclusion AI can classify ear disease from otoscopy. A concerted effort is required to establish a comprehensive and reliable otoscopy database for algorithm training. An AI-supported otoscopy system may assist health care workers, trainees and primary care practitioners with less otology experience identify ear disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据