4.1 Article

Early outcomes of kidney transplant recipients from donors with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A report of 5 cases

期刊

CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY
卷 98, 期 1, 页码 54-61

出版社

DUSTRI-VERLAG DR KARL FEISTLE
DOI: 10.5414/CN110847

关键词

kidney transplantation; SARS-CoV-2 positive donors; outcomes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that kidney grafts from donors with a recent history of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection but with preserved kidney function can be safely transplanted and have good early outcomes.
Background: Transplanting kidneys from donors with a recent history of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is uncommon due to concerns about the risk of viral transmission and the quality of kidneys from these donors. To date, there are no conclusive data on viral transmission from extra pulmonary solid organ transplants. Given the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in potential donors, shortage of kidneys available for transplantation, and low risk of viral transmission, we developed a clinical protocol for accepting kidneys from donors with recent severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who demonstrate preserved kidney function. Materials and methods: We collected data on early outcomes of 5 kidney transplant recipients from 4 deceased donors hospitalized for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: Donor creatinine ranged from 0.51 to 0.60 mg/dL and kidney donor profile index (KDPI) from 14 to 52%. Three of the five kidneys were from donation after circulatory death. All recipients were fully vaccinated, and 4/5 received post-exposure prophylactic monoclonal antibody treatment. While 3 recipients had delayed graft function, all had excellent graft function at 3 or 4 weeks postoperatively. None of the recipients displayed signs or symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection post-transplant. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that kidney grafts from donors with a recent history of severe SARS-CoV-2 in fection but with preserved kidney function can be safely used and have good early outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据