4.7 Review

A global survey in the developmental landscape of possible vaccination strategies for COVID-19

期刊

CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2022.108958

关键词

COVID-19 vaccines; Novel coronavirus vaccines; Pandemic vaccine development; SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate; COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials; Candidate vaccines coronaviruses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of COVID-19 vaccines has been regulated to ensure an effective approach. Numerous vaccines have reached different stages of testing, and platforms such as nucleic acid vaccines show promise in terms of availability and safety. Approved vaccines come from various countries, and distribution is a key challenge. Additionally, research has found a potential link between the Bacillus Calmette-Gue ' rin (BCG) vaccination program and lower disease severity.
The development of COVID-19 vaccines was promptly regulated to ensure the best possible approach. By January 2022, 75 candidates reached preclinical evaluation in various animal models, 114 vaccines were in clinical trials on humans, and 48 were in the final testing stages. Vaccine platforms range from whole virus vaccines to nucleic acid vaccines, which are the most promising in prompt availability and safety. The USA and Europe have approved vaccines developed by Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNa1273). So far, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca-University of Oxford, Sinopharm, Sinovac Biotech Gamaleya, Bharat Biotech, and Novavax have documented effective vaccines. Even with technological advances and a fast-paced development approach, many limitations and problems need to be overcome before a large-scale production of new vaccines can start. The Key is to ensure equal and fair distribution globally through regulatory measures. Recent studies link Bacillus Calmette-Gue ' rin (BCG) vaccination programs and lower disease severity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据