4.7 Article

Comparison of Quality Measures for Detection of Neoplasia at Screening Colonoscopy

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.03.023

关键词

Colorectal Cancer; Quality; Adenoma Detection Rate; Screening

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined whether colonoscopy quality measures other than adenoma detection rate (ADR) are associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and death. The results showed that all quality measures, including ADR, polyp detection rate (PDR), advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR), number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC), and number of adenomas per colonoscopy with at least one adenoma (APPC), were significantly associated with CRC risk and death.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The proportion of colonoscopies with at least one adenoma (adenoma detection rate [ADR]) is inversely associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and death. The aim of this study was to examine whether such associations exist for colonoscopy quality measures other than ADR.METHODS: We used data from the Polish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program collected in 2000-2011. For all endoscopists who performed >= 100 colonoscopies we calculated detection rates of adenomas (ADR), polyps (PDR), and advanced adenomas (>= 10 mm/villous component/high-grade dysplasia [AADR]); and number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) and per colonoscopy with >= 1 adenoma (APPC). We followed patients until CRC diagnosed before recommended surveillance, death, or December 31, 2019. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confi-dence intervals (CIs) using Cox proportional-hazard models. We used Harrell's C statistic to compare the predictive power of the quality measures.RESULTS: Data on 173,287 patients (median age, 56 years; 37.8% male) and 262 endoscopists were used. During a median follow-up of 10 years and 1,490,683 person-years, we identified 395 CRCs. All quality measures were significantly associated with CRC risk and death. The relative reductions in CRC risk were as follows: for ADR >= 24.9% (reference <12.1%; HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.25-0.66), PDR >= 42.7% (reference <19.9%; HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.51), AADR >= 9.1% (reference <4.1%; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.96), APC >= 0.37 (reference <0.15; HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.58), and APPC >= 1.54 (reference <1.19; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.83). AADR was the only quality measure with significantly lower predictive power than ADR (Harrell's C, 59.7 vs 63.4; P [ .001). Similar relative reductions were observed for CRC death.CONCLUSIONS: This large observational study confirmed the inverse association between ADR and CRC risk and death. The PDR and APC quality measures appear to be comparable with ADR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据