4.7 Review

P-tau217 in Alzheimer's disease

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 531, 期 -, 页码 100-111

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.03.018

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Biomarker; Plasma; Tau; P-tau217

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasma p-tau217 is a sensitive and specific marker for predicting and monitoring the progression of Alzheimer's disease, but further studies are needed to establish widely applicable diagnostic cut-off values.
Background and aims: The potential of disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease has greatly stimulated interest in the development of minimally invasive testing for early identification of at-risk individuals. Accordingly, identification of blood-based biomarkers is paramount. The recent discovery of plasma phosphorylated at threonine217 (p-tau217) may provide a turning point in Alzheimer's disease detection. This systematic review aims to evaluate the available evidence on the use of plasma p-tau217 as a marker to predict Alzheimer's disease and to monitor disease progression. Material and methods: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. In total, 676 publications were identified, of which 16 were in accordance with the pre-defined eligibility criteria. Results: Current evidence shows that plasma p-tau217 is a sensitive maker of the clinical manifestation and progression of Alzheimer's disease and of pathological changes associated with this condition, including amyloid accumulation, tau burden, brain atrophy and physical degradation. Moreover, given that plasma p-tau217 does not predict such changes in patients with other neurodegenerative disorders, plasma p-tau217 is also specific to Alzheimer's disease. Conclusion: More large, diverse community studies are needed to harmonize plasma p-tau217 measurements and to determine widely applicable diagnostic cut-off values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据