4.7 Article

Frozen vs Fresh Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Clinical Resolution of Diarrhea in Patients With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection A Randomized Clinical Trial

期刊

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.18098

关键词

-

资金

  1. Physicians Services Incorporated
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Ontario

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IMPORTANCE Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major burden in health care and community settings. CDI recurrence is of particular concern because of limited treatment options and associated clinical and infection control issues. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising, but not readily available, intervention. OBJECTIVE To determine whether frozen-and-thawed (frozen, experimental) FMT is noninferior to fresh (standard) FMT in terms of clinical efficacy among patients with recurrent or refractory CDI and to assess the safety of both types of FMT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial enrolling 232 adults with recurrent or refractory CDI, conducted between July 2012 and September 2014 at 6 academic medical centers in Canada. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly allocated to receive frozen (n = 114) or fresh (n = 118) FMT via enema. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measures were clinical resolution of diarrhea without relapse at 13 weeks and adverse events. Noninferiority margin was set at 15%. RESULTS A total of 219 patients (n = 108 in the frozen FMT group and n = 111 in the fresh FMT group) were included in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population and 178 (frozen FMT: n = 91, fresh FMT: n = 87) in the per-protocol population. In the per-protocol population, the proportion of patients with clinical resolution was 83.5% for the frozen FMT group and 85.1% for the fresh FMT group (difference, -1.6% [95% Cl, -10.5% to infinity]; P = .01 for noninferiority). In the mITT population the clinical resolution was 75.0% for the frozen FMT group and 70.3% for the fresh FMT group (difference, 4.7% [95% CI, -5.2% to infinity]; P < .001 for noninferiority). There were no differences in the proportion of adverse or serious adverse events between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults with recurrent or refractory CDI, the use of frozen compared with fresh FMT did not result in worse proportion of clinical resolution of diarrhea. Given the potential advantages of providing frozen FMT, its use is a reasonable option in this setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据