4.6 Article

Numerical investigation of solar cells based on hybrid organic cation perovskite with inorganic HTL via SCAPS-1D

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 94-109

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjph.2021.12.024

关键词

MA(0.5)FA(0.5)PbI(3); inorganic HTL; Solar cell; numerical simulation; SCAPS-1D

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to find a better substitute for organic Spiro-OMeTAD HTL through numerical simulation to solve the problems of thermal instability, degradation, defects, and high cost in conventional MAPbI3 solar cells. The research identifies Cu2O HTL as the best candidate for substitution, which improves the stability and performance of the solar cells.
Among the major problems hindering the performance and commercialisation of conventional MAPbI3 solar cells are thermal instability, degradation, defects and the high cost of Spiro-OMeTAD HTL. However, the hybrid or mixed organic cation perovskite (MA(1-x)FA(x)PbI(3)) has good crystallinity which can reduce defects and increase the charge carrier lifetime. The aim of this work is to find, by numerical simulation using SCAPS-1D software, a better substitute for organic Spiro-OMeTAD HTL in order to solve the problems caused by it. First, we validated our solar cell structures by a comparative study of the J-V characteristics of the experiment and the simulation. Secondly, we conducted a numerical simulation study of a number of inorganic HTLs (NiO, CuI, CuSCN, MoO3, and Cu2O) that replace Spiro-OMeTAD in the hybrid organic cation perovskite cell structure. Based on the study of the performance and stability of these different HTLs, we obtain Cu2O HTL as the best candidate to substitute the organic Spiro-OMeTAD HTL. The MA(1-x)FA(x)PbI(3)-based solar cell with Cu2O as inorganic HTL shows a very good stability (TC =-0.0014%/C) and better performance with an efficiency of 26.67%. This work contributes to a better knowledge on the numerical optimization of perovskite-based solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据