4.7 Article

Preparation of a porphyrin-polyoxometalate hybrid and its photocatalytic degradation performance for mustard gas simulant 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 2625-2629

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.09.093

关键词

Chemical warfare agent; Mustard gas simulant; Porphyrin; Polyoxometalate; Photooxidation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An organic-inorganic hybrid material was successfully prepared through a simple ion-exchange method and exhibited excellent performance in photocatalytic degradation experiments, showing great potential for applications in fields such as wastewater treatment.
By combining 5,10,15,20-tetra(4-chlorine)phenylporphyrin (TClPP) and alpha-Keggin polyoxometalate H5PV2Mo10O40 (H5PVMo) via a simple ion-exchange method, an organic-inorganic hybrid material [C44H28N4Cl4](1.5)[H2PMo10V2O40]center dot 2C(2)H(6)O (H2TClPP-H2PVMo) was prepared and thoroughly characterized by a variety of techniques. The homogeneous photocatalytic degradation of 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (CEES) (5 mu L) by H2TClPP-H2PVMo (1 x 10(-6) mol/L) was studied in methanol and methanol-water mixed solvent (v/v = 1:1), in which the degradation rate of CEES reached 99.52% and 99.14%, respectively. The reaction followed first-order reaction kinetics, and the half-life and kinetic constant in methanol and the mixed solvent were respectively 33.0 min, -0.021 min(-1) and 15.7 min, -0.043 min(-1). Mechanism analysis indicated that under visible light irradiation in the air, CEES was degraded via oxidation and alcoholysis/hydrolysis in methanol and the mixed solvent. O-2(center dot-) and O-1(2) generated by H2TClPP-H2PVMo selectively oxidized CEES into a nontoxic sulfoxide. Singlet oxygen capture experiments showed that H2TClPP-H2PVMo (phi = 0.73) had a higher quantum yield of singlet oxygen than TClPP (phi = 0.35) under an air atmosphere and visible light irradiation. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据