4.8 Article

Hydrogen Bond Interaction in the Trade-Off Between Electrolyte Voltage Window and Supercapacitor Low-Temperature Performances

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 15, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202200539

关键词

electrolytes; energy storage; high voltage window; hydrogen bonds; supercapacitors

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21975109, 52075224]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20201423]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M651718]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effect of weak interaction between electrolyte species on the voltage window and low-temperature capacitive performance of supercapacitors. The results show that strong H-bond interaction expands the voltage window but deteriorates rate performance, while weak H-bond improves low-temperature performance. Supercapacitors with optimized electrolytes exhibit high voltage and good low-temperature performance.
Liquid electrolyte determines the voltage window and extreme working temperature of supercapacitors. However, the effect of weak interaction between electrolyte species on voltage window and low-temperature capacitive performance is unclear. Herein, an electrolyte model system with increasing H-bond interaction was constructed to clarify this concern. The results indicated that strong H-bond interaction was positively correlated with the number of hydroxyls, which was beneficial to expand voltage window, but deteriorated rate performance; weak H-bond improved low-temperature performance. Supercapacitors with an optimized electrolyte presented high voltage and good low-temperature performance; even at -40 degrees C, the maximum energy density could be maintained at 7.0 Wh kg(-1) (>80 % retention relative to at -20 degrees C). This study revealed the mechanism of the influence of the H-bonds on electrolyte voltage window and anti-freezing capability and provided a new insight for the design of electrolytes with both high working voltage and low-temperature performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据