4.5 Article

A Theoretical Perspective to Study the Optical Properties of Tetrafluoroborates

期刊

CHEMPHYSCHEM
卷 23, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.202200205

关键词

non-pi-conjugated tetrahedra; deep-ultraviolet optical materials; first-principles calculations; data statistics; optical properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21964016, 11664038]
  2. Tianshan Innovation Team Program of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [2020D14038]
  3. Tianchi Talent Program [TCBS202131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, non-pi-conjugated tetrafluoroborates were systematically investigated by theoretical calculations. The results show that tetrafluoroborates with alkali and/or alkaline-earth metals have better deep-ultraviolet transmission and smaller bandgaps with increasing ionic radii.
In this study, a series of tetrafluoroborates with non-pi-conjugated [BF4] tetrahedra are investigated systematically by first-principles calculations. Theoretical studies demonstrate that tetrafluoroborates with alkali and/or alkaline-earth metals are more favorable for deep-ultraviolet transmission and are comparable to the classical deep-ultraviolet (deep-UV) material, MgF2. Furthermore, bandgap decrease with the increasing of ionic radii in alkali and/or alkaline-earth metals. Introducing highly polarizable cations with d(10)-configuration or cations with lone pair electrons into the structure will decrease the bandgaps. The birefringence and second harmonic generation effects are not large enough in tetrafluoroborates because polarizability anisotropy and hyperpolarizability in non-pi-conjugated [BF4] tetrahedra are much smaller than those in pi-conjugated groups. However, the second harmonic generation effect for [BF4] tetrahedra has a higher contribution in comparison with that due to birefringence. To effectively synthesize the borate fluorides or fluorooxoborates in the deep-UV region, raw materials with B-F bonds are preferred.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据