4.7 Article

Effects of different oxygen conditions on pollutants removal and the abundances of tetracycline resistance genes in activated sludge systems

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 291, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132681

关键词

Activated sludge; Tetracycline; Divalent copper; Tetracycline resistance genes; Aerobic; Anaerobic

资金

  1. National Key R & D Plan Key Project [2019YFC1804301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The individual and combined effects of tetracycline and divalent copper on activated sludge systems were studied in this research. The addition of tetracycline did not affect system performance, while the addition of copper inhibited biological phosphorous removal. Oxygen conditions had opposite effects on the abundances of high-risk TRGs.
The individual and combined effects of tetracycline (TC) and divalent copper (Cu2+) on the performance of activated sludge systems and the abundances of tetracycline resistance genes (TRGs) in activated sludge, under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, were studied. Activated sludge systems received TC (0.2 mg L-1) and Cu2+ (5 mg L-1) separately or jointly under either aerobic or anaerobic conditions. The addition of TC did not affect the performance of activated sludge systems and the addition of Cu2+ and mixed TC/Cu2+ inhibited biological phosphorus removal. The TC removal efficiencies in systems under aerobic and anaerobic conditions were 98.4%-99.7% and 96.8%-99.9%, respectively, and Cu2+ promoted TC removal in activated sludge systems. The TC degradation product was 4-epitetracycline (ETC) in activated sludge systems under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. The total relative abundances of TRGs (tetA, tetC, tetE, tetM, tetO, tetW, tetX and tetB(P)) in activated sludge showed opposite development trends under the two oxygen conditions and aerobic condition was beneficial to the attenuation of high-risk TRGs. The results of this study might improve evaluation of the combined effects of antibiotics and heavy metals on wastewater biological treatment systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据