4.7 Article

Enantioselective separation, analysis and stereoselective dissipation of the chiral pesticide cloquintocet-mexyl using a modified QuEChERS method by high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 291, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133084

关键词

Enantioseparation; Cloquintocet-mexyl; QuEChERS; Stereoselective dissipation; HPLC-MS; MS

资金

  1. Educational Department of Liaoning Province [2019LQNO6]
  2. Excellent Youth Talent Support Program of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University [ZQN2018019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient and novel enantioseparation method was developed and validated to quantify the enantiomers of cloquintocet-mexyl in different matrices. The method showed reliable performance and provided basic data for the risk evaluation of cloquintocet-mexyl in food and environmental safety.
An efficient and novel enantioseparation method was successfully developed and validated to quantify the enantiomers of cloquintocet-mexyl in soil, millet, enoki mushroom, oilseed rape, and watermelon using a modified QuEChERS technique combined with HPLC-MS/MS. This method showed reliable performances for determining both enantiomers of cloquintocet-mexyl in all five matrices. The limits of detection and limits of quantification were in the range of 0.06-0.15 mu g kg-1 and 0.2-0.5 mu g kg-1, respectively. Good linearities were obtained with correlation coefficients >= 0.9954. The mean recoveries were between 84.1% and 111.5%, with relative standard deviations ranging from 1.2% to 9.8% at three spiked levels. Additionally, the study of stereoselective dissipation of cloquintocet-mexyl in soil indicated that (R)-cloquintocet-mexyl was preferentially degraded. This work is the first to describe a chiral analytical method and enantioselective behavior of cloquintocet-mexyl and provide basic data for the risk evaluation of cloquintocet-mexyl in food and environmental safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据