4.7 Article

Construction of novel luminescent thermometers based on dual-emission centers of rare-earth and bismuth ions

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 303, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135150

关键词

FIR technology; Double perovskite structure; Color tunable; Luminescent thermometers

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ITC (MSIT) of the Korean government [2021R1A3B1068304]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a method for constructing luminescent thermometers based on high-temperature solid-state reactions, using rare earth elements doping in phosphors for temperature sensing. The color changes are achieved by tuning the ratio of the rare earth-doped phosphors. The optical thermometers demonstrate higher sensitivity and superior temperature sensing performance.
Optical thermometry based on fluorescence intensity ratio (FIR) technology has several advantages for industrial and medical applications such as remote signaling, non-invasiveness, and excellent spatial resolution. Here, an approach to the construction of luminescent thermometers is proposed based on high-temperature solid-state reactions through doping of rare earth (RE) elements (e.g., samarium (Sm3+) or europium (Eu3+)) into Ca2Y0.97Bi0.03SbO6 (CYBS) phosphors. The tuning of the CYBS:Eu3+ and CYBS:Sm3+ ratios in the phosphors provided a wide range of color changes from purplish blue to red and from purplish blue to pink, respectively. The superiority of optical thermometer is validated by higher values of absolute sensitivity (Sa) and relative sensitivity (Sr). As such, both phosphors exhibit excellent temperature sensing performance with Sa/Sr values (at 483 K) of 4.945 x 10-2/0.968 x 10-2 K-1 (CYBS:0.05Eu3+) and 2.964 x 10-2/0.864 x 10-2 K-1 (CYBS:0.05 Sm3+). Thus, RE-doped CYBS materials with color tuning properties and superior temperature sensing performance are recommended for the construction of novel luminescent optical thermometers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据