4.7 Article

Mixed industrial wastewater treatment by the combination of heterogeneous electro-Fenton and electrocoagulation processes

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 290, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133348

关键词

Handling Editor; Derek Muir; Mixed industrial wastewater; Electro-Fenton; Modified laterite; Electrocoagulation; Combined process

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficiency of combined electro-Fenton (EF) and electrocoagulation (EC) processes for treating mixed industrial wastewater was investigated in this study. The use of alkali modified laterite soil as a heterogeneous EF catalyst resulted in superior performance compared to raw laterite soil. By combining the EF process followed by the EC process, a high COD removal rate of 85.27% was achieved after 2 hours of treatment. The EF + EC strategy was found to be better than the EC + EF strategy in terms of nullifying the neutralization requirement, achieving high mineralization efficiency, enhancing biodegradability, and reducing sludge generation.
Mixed industrial wastewater treatment efficiency of combined electro-Fenton (EF) and electrocoagulation (EC) processes was investigated in the present study. Alkali modified laterite soil was used as a heterogeneous EF catalyst and found superior performance than the raw laterite soil. Initially, the effect of catalyst dosage, initial pH, and applied voltage on the performance of EF process was carried out. A total of 54.57% COD removal was observed after 60 min of the EF treatment. Further treatment was carried out with EC process at different voltages. A total of 85.27% COD removal after 2 h treatment was observed by combining two electrochemical processes. Performance of EF followed by EC (EF + EC) process was compared with EC followed by EF (EC + EF) process. Even though efficiency is the same, EF + EC is a better strategy than EC + EF as it nullifies the neutralization requirement after EF process in addition to high mineralization efficiency, enhanced biodegradability, and lesser sludge generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据