4.6 Article

Dissolution Behavior and Varied Mesoporosity of Zeolites by NH4F Etching

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 28, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202104339

关键词

Zeolites; NH4F etching; Dissolution mechanism; Mesopore; Diffusion

资金

  1. Thousand Talents Program for Foreign Experts [WQ20152100316]
  2. NSFC [21991090, NSFC21991091]
  3. Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science [D01-76/2021]
  4. [NSFC22178389]
  5. [NSFC21975285]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation of mesopores in zeolite crystals is influenced by the zeolite architecture at both nano- and sub-nano scales. The dissolution behavior of zeolites is determined by the spatio-temporal dissolution of the framework at the nano-scale, and the diffusivity of reactants and dissolved products at the sub-nano scale. These findings have important implications for understanding zeolite dissolution behavior and designing hierarchical zeolites.
The mesopores formation in zeolite crystals has long been considered to occur through the stochastic hydrolysis and removal of framework atoms. Here, we investigate the NH4F etching of representative small, medium, and large pore zeolites and show that the zeolite dissolution behavior, therefore the mesopore formation probability, is dominated by zeolite architecture at both nano- and sub-nano scales. At the nano-scale, the hidden mosaics of zeolite structure predetermine the spatio-temporal dissolution of the framework, hence the size, shape, location, and orientation of the mesopores. At the sub-nano scale, the intrinsic micropore size and connectivity jointly determine the diffusivity of reactant and dissolved products. As a result, the dissolution propensity varies from removing small framework fragments to consuming nanodomains and up to full digestion of the outmost part of zeolite crystals. The new knowledge will lead to new understanding of zeolite dissolution behavior and new adapted strategies for tailoring hierarchical zeolites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据