4.8 Article

Parallel Alignment of Methylammonium Cations in an Orthorhombic CH3NH3PbCl3 Single Crystal Observed by Polarized Micro-Raman Scattering Spectroscopy

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 34, 期 7, 页码 2972-2980

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03744

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2016R1D1A1B01009032, NRF-2018R1A6A1A03025340, 2022R1A2C1010497]
  2. Iwaki Scholarship Foundation
  3. Yokohama National University
  4. Yokohama Kogyokai
  5. [202115353]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2022R1A2C1010497] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research found a unique alignment of MA ions in CH3NH3PbCl3, indicating the presence of ferroelectricity in hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites.
To increase their efficiency and improve their chemical stability, hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites (HOIPs) have been studied intensely over the past few years. There are some unresolved issues with the properties of HOIPs, such as the relation between the configuration of methylammonium (MA) ions and their electronic and structural properties. For example, it was theoretically proposed that the change in the bandgap from direct to indirect and/or structural distortion can be caused by a change in the orientation of the MA ions with respect to the PbX3 cage in CH3NH3PbX3 (X = I, Br, or Cl). By using polarized Raman scattering spectroscopy, we experimentally show that the MA ions in CH3NH3PbCl3 single crystals are parallelly oriented toward a special crystallographic direction in the low-temperature orthorhombic phase at least on our measurement scale of approximately square micrometers. Experimental measurement results verified by density functional theory calculations indicate the presence of a macroscopic domain consists of a parallel directional alignment of the MA ions, a strong signature of ferroelectricity in HOIPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据