4.8 Article

Unassisted Uranyl Photoreduction and Separation in a Donor- Acceptor Covalent Organic Framework

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 2771-2778

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c04407

关键词

-

资金

  1. Soochow University
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21872037]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation [21825601, 21790374]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The donor-acceptor covalent organic framework TTT-DTDA was found to have long-lived excited states, allowing for direct photoreduction of uranium. Illumination in solutions containing only uranyl ions produced crystalline uranyl peroxide species on the COF. TTT-DTDA COF showed high selectivity for uranium and recyclability in competing ion experiments.
The donor-acceptor covalent organic framework (COF) TTT-DTDA (TTT = thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-2,5-dicarbaldehyde and DTDA = 4,4',4 ''-(1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triyl)trianiline) was prepared and found to have long-lived excited states (>100 ms) characterized by transient absorption spectroscopy. These excited-state lifetimes were sufficient to perform the direct photoreduction of uranium at ppm concentration levels. The photoreduction of soluble uranyl species to insoluble reduced uranium products is an attractive separation for uranium, typically accomplished with sacrificial reagents and protective gases. In the case of TTT-DTDA, illumination in aqueous solutions containing only uranyl ions produced crystalline uranyl peroxide species ([UO2 (O-2)]) at the COF that were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and infrared spectroscopy. The maximum absorption capacity of TTT-DTDA was found to be 123 mg U/g COF at pH 5 after 10 h of illumination in solutions devoid of sacrificial reagents or protective gases. The TTT-DTDA COF was recyclable and maintained high selectivity for uranium in competing ion experiments, which are necessary requirements for a practical uranium extraction strategy based on photochemical uranium reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据