4.8 Review

Biomolecular and Biological Applications of Solid-State NMR with Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Enhancement

期刊

CHEMICAL REVIEWS
卷 122, 期 10, 页码 9795-9847

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c01043

关键词

-

资金

  1. French National Research Agency (Labex ARCANE CBH-EUR-GS) [ANR-17-EURE0003]
  2. French National Research Agency (Glyco@Alps) [ANR-15-IDEX-02]
  3. French National Research Agency [ANR-16-CE110030-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid-state NMR spectroscopy with magic-angle spinning enables the investigation of biological systems in their native context. However, low sensitivity due to the presence of other molecular species and the challenge of detecting low concentration species limit the feasibility of certain investigations. By applying dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP), the experimental time required can be significantly reduced, broadening the scope of biological solid-state NMR applications.
Solid-state NMR spectroscopy (ssNMR) with magic-angle spinning (MAS) enables the investigation of biological systems within their native context, such as lipid membranes, viral capsid assemblies, and cells. However, such ambitious investigations often suffer from low sensitivity due to the presence of significant amounts of other molecular species, which reduces the effective concentration of the biomolecule or interaction of interest. Certain investigations requiring the detection of very low concentration species remain unfeasible even with increasing experimental time for signal averaging. By applying dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) to overcome the sensitivity challenge, the experimental time required can be reduced by orders of magnitude, broadening the feasible scope of applications for biological solid-state NMR. In this review, we outline strategies commonly adopted for biological applications of DNP, indicate ongoing challenges, and present a comprehensive overview of biological investigations where MAS-DNP has led to unique insights.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据