4.6 Article

Mesoscale model of radial hydrodynamics for fluidizing small particles with low solid holdup in gas-liquid-solid circulating fluidized bed

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.117413

关键词

Radial hydrodynamics; Mesoscale; Gas-liquid-solid; Circulating fluidized bed; Modeling

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [22008169, 91834303]
  2. Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems [MPCS2021-D-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gas-liquid-solid circulating fluidized bed (GLSCFB) is an important reactor with critical radial hydrodynamics for industrial design and scale-up. A mesoscale method based on the energy-minimization multiscale principle is used to model the radial flow structures, which can reasonably predict the radial distributions of flow parameters and analyze the influence of operating conditions on radial hydrodynamics in GLSCFB.
Gas-liquid-solid circulating fluidized bed (GLSCFB) is an important reactor. Radial hydrodynamics of GLSCFB are critical for the industrial design and scale-up, but the hydrodynamics have not been well described. To mechanically model the radial flow structures, a mesoscale method based on the energy-minimization multiscale principle is applied. A comparison between experimental data and model calculations shows that the radial mesoscale model can reasonably predict the radial distributions of the flow parameters and analyze the influence of the operating conditions on the radial hydrodynamics in GLSCFB for fluidizing solid particles of small diameters (d(p) <= 1 mm) and low solid holdup (epsilon(s) <= 15%). Additionally, model predictions show that the peak positions of the suspension and transportation energy consumed per unit mass of solid particles and liquid shear stress range from 0.75 to 0.9, which is an obvious indicator of the radial flow structure. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据