4.6 Article

Mapping and optimization of an industrial steam methane reformer by the design of experiments (DOE)

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 349-365

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2022.05.035

关键词

Steam methane reforming; Design of experiments; Optimization; Response surface analysis; Box-Behnken design

资金

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - Brazil (CAPES) [001]
  2. COPENOR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the optimal operating conditions of a steam methane reformer using the design of experiments and response surface methodology. The research proposes an optimization problem to maximize methane conversion and syngas quality.
Natural gas is an important precursor to produce synthesis gas through the steam reforming process. This work aims to map the optimal operating conditions of a steam methane reformer based on the design of experiments (DOE) approach and response surface methodology (RSM) relying on a phenomenological model validated with industrial data. A screening factorial design 2(IV)(8-4) is initially conducted to identify the most significant process variables, followed by a 2(5) full factorial design for a more accurate analysis of the main and interaction effects of the input variables on the methane conversion and syngas quality. The most significant variables are the steam to carbon ratio, the flow rate of the stream fed to the reforming tubes, and feed gas and combustion air temperatures. A Box-Behnken design (BBD) with 25 experiments is carried out and polynomial models are proposed and validated through the analysis of variance with great confidence. An optimization problem is formulated to maximize the methane conversion, ensure the quality, and tube wall temperature constraints. This problem is solved in Excel, using the generalized reduced gradients method and the calculated optimal point is analyzed through contour plots. (C) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据