4.7 Review

Metal organic frameworks for antibacterial applications

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 435, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.134975

关键词

Metal organic frameworks; Antibacterial therapy; Composite materials; Antibiotics; Antimicrobial resistance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81803480]
  2. General Research Fund of Hong Kong [GRF CityU 11306717]
  3. Scottish Funding Council-Global Challenges Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The problem of bacterial resistance to antibiotics is becoming increasingly serious, and the development of new antibiotics is much slower than the development of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria. To overcome antibiotic resistance, new therapeutic strategies need to be sought, and new materials such as metal organic frameworks may be potential candidates.
The number of cases of bacterial resistance to antibiotics has been exponentially rising over the last decade. This issue is getting worse as the research and development of new antibiotics is much slower than the speed of pathogenic bacteria acquiring resistance to antibiotic treatment. To fight against antibacterial resistance, new therapeutic strategies have to be sought as alternatives to currently administered antibiotics. Many new materials, for instance, metal organic frameworks possess desirable properties such as improved bacterial internalization, flexible structural control, high selectivity, and controlled drug release and therefore, are potentially good candidates for antibacterial therapy to overcome antibiotic resistance. This review describes the most recent development of the field of the antibacterial applications of metal organic frameworks, and their hybrids and derivatives, followed by an in-depth analysis of their advantages, disadvantages and design factors of these materials. Finally, we present our insights into the important aspects of the future development of metal organic frameworks for antibacterial applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据