4.7 Article

Manipulating the morphology of 3D flower-like CoMn2O4 bimetallic catalyst for enhancing the activation of peroxymonosulfate toward the degradation of selected persistent pharmaceuticals in water

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 436, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135244

关键词

3D flower-like; CoMn2O4; Peroxymonsulfate (PMS); Heterogeneous activation; Tetracycline (TC)

资金

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology [109-2222-E-992-002]
  2. MOST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 3D flower-like CoMn2O4 catalyst was synthesized via hydrothermal-calcination technique as peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activator for the remediation of pharmaceuticals, exemplified by antibiotics tetracycline (TC) in aqueous solutions. The CoMn2O4-PMS system showed a broad pH range adaptability and remained efficient under different water matrices. The catalyst exhibited good stability and degradation efficiency, with metal ion dissolution below drinking water standard.
A 3D flower-like CoMn2O4 catalyst was synthesized via hydrothermal-calcination technique as peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activator for the remediation of pharmaceuticals, exemplified by antibiotics tetracycline (TC) in aqueous solutions. TC degradation in the CoMn2O4-PMS system took place over a broad pH range of 5 to 9. Different water matrices (tap water and lake water) did not affect the efficiency of CoMn2O4/PMS system. Multiple uses of CoMn2O4 did not alter the surface properties and catalytic TC degradation efficiency. The dissolution of component metal ions was below the allowable drinking water standard. Carbon oxidation state was increased from -0.51 to 1.2, indicating high degree of mineralization. Non-radical, specifically singlet oxygen, and radical, namely, hydroxyl and sulfate radical, contributed 30.6% and 68.4% to TC degradation, respectively. The CoMn2O4-PMS system was efficient in the degradation of several pharmaceuticals, including tetracycline, SMX, Cipro CIP and BPA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据