4.7 Article

Plasma catalytic removal of VOCs using cycled storage-discharge (CSD) mode: An assessment methodology based on toluene for reaction kinetics and intermediates

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 433, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.134338

关键词

Plasma catalysis; VOCs; Toluene; Kinetics; Intermediates

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11975069]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT20GJ211]
  3. Liaoning Revitalization Talent Program [XLYC2008032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on reaction kinetics and intermediates in plasma oxidation of adsorbed toluene in the cycled storage-discharge mode, with formic acid and oxalic acid identified as main intermediates. The selectivity of intermediates shows an inverse variation to CO2, indicating conversion into CO2, while CO is insignificant. Carbon balance confirms the reliability of the evaluation approach.
The cycled storage-discharge (CSD) mode features significant energy saving and negligible amount of secondary pollutants, boosting immediate application of plasma catalytic removal of VOCs. We report here a novel eval-uation methodology for reaction kinetics and intermediates studies on plasma oxidation of adsorbed toluene in the CSD mode. Experiments were performed using toluene as a model VOC adsorbed on HZSM-5 in a storage stage and O-2 plasma powered by pulsed high voltage in a discharge stage. Discharge time-dependent conversions of adsorbed toluene were obtained, and thus the apparent kinetic order of adsorbed toluene and apparent rate constant were determined. The intermediates identification was implemented, being mainly formic acid and oxalic acid. Discharge time-dependent selectivity of intermediates shows an inverse variation to that of CO2, which indicates conversion of the intermediates into CO2. CO is an insignificant product. The carbon balance verifies the reliability of this evaluation approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据