4.7 Article

Structure and surface insight into a temperature-sensitive CaO-based CO2 sorbent

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 435, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.134960

关键词

Calcium looping; CO2 capture; Alkali salt promoting; Carbonation kinetics; Temperature-sensitive CO2 sorbent

资金

  1. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [52176109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study prepared NaCl-modified CaO-based sorbents through simultaneous hydration and impregnation, and investigated their cyclic CO2 capture capacity. The results showed that NaCl could tailor the temperature sensitivity of the sorbents and enhance their carbonation activity, particularly at higher temperatures.
Calcium looping process is a prospective strategy to remove CO2 from flue gas. However, the CO2 capture capacity of the CaO-based sorbents would be spoiled severe over the repeated cycles. In this work, a kind of NaCl-modified CaO-based sorbents were prepared by a simultaneous hydration and impregnation process and explored for cyclic CO2 capture by a simultaneous thermal analyzer. The promotion mechanism was discussed by electron microscope, X-ray diffraction, N-2 physisorption, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and so on. Results showed that NaCl tailored the temperature sensitivity of CaO-based sorbents, and it was a good promoter to enhance the carbonation activity of CaO-based sorbents, especially under higher temperature modes. At higher temperatures, NaCl would cover the surface of CaO, and promote the CO2 transportability in the modified sorbent, and then greatly improve the carbonation ability of the sorbents over the cycles. After 50 repeated cycles, the CO2 capture capacity of 10 NaCl/CaO still retained at 0.288 g/g and 0.237 g/g when carbonated at 650 degrees C and 750 degrees C, which were 2.05 and 2.63 times that of CaCO3 AR respectively. Hence, the temperature-sensitive CaO-based sorbent promoted by NaCl shows a promising prospect for CO2 capture from flue gas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据