4.4 Article

Second Coordination Sphere Effects on the Mechanistic Pathways for Dioxygen Activation by a Ferritin: Involvement of a Tyr Radical and the Identification of a Cation Binding Site

期刊

CHEMBIOCHEM
卷 23, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202200257

关键词

density functional calculations; enzyme catalysis; enzyme mechanisms; inorganic reaction mechanisms; oxygen activation

资金

  1. BBSRC [BB/R002363/1]
  2. BBSRC [BB/R002363/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ferritins are widespread diiron enzymes that play a role in iron detoxification and oxidative stress responses, as well as serving as metabolic iron storage. Computational studies have provided insights into the structure and reactivity of ferritins, revealing the importance of the active site tyrosine residue and a potential cation binding site. The findings offer new details on the early mechanistic steps of ferritin enzymes.
Ferritins are ubiquitous diiron enzymes involved in iron(II) detoxification and oxidative stress responses and can act as metabolic iron stores. The overall reaction mechanisms of ferritin enzymes are still unclear, particularly concerning the role of the conserved, near catalytic center Tyr residue. Thus, we carried out a computational study of a ferritin using a large cluster model of well over 300 atoms including its first- and second-coordination sphere. The calculations reveal important insight into the structure and reactivity of ferritins. Specifically, the active site Tyr residue delivers a proton and electron in the catalytic cycle prior to iron(II) oxidation. In addition, the calculations highlight a likely cation binding site at Asp(65), which through long-range electrostatic interactions, influences the electronic configuration and charge distributions of the metal center. The results are consistent with experimental observations but reveal novel detail of early mechanistic steps that lead to an unusual mixed-valent iron(III)-iron(II) center.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据