4.7 Article

Neural network-based adaptive synchronization for second-order nonlinear multiagent systems with unknown disturbance

期刊

CHAOS
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0068958

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) [61873213, 61633011]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project [2018AAA0100101]
  3. Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing [cstc2019jcyj-msxmX036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper addresses the problem of distributed adaptive synchronization for a certain class of unknown second-order nonlinear multiagent systems subjected to external disturbance. It proposes a neural network-based disturbance observer and a new distributed adaptive synchronization criterion based on the approximation capability of neural networks. It also explores the distributed adaptive synchronization criterion without velocity measurement feedback.
This paper handles the distributed adaptive synchronization problem for a class of unknown second-order nonlinear multiagent systems subject to external disturbance. It is supposed to be an unknown one for the underlying external disorder. First, the neural network-based disturbance observer is developed to deal with the impact induced by the strange disturbance. Then, a new distributed adaptive synchronization criterion is put forward based on the approximation capability of the neural networks. Next, we propose the necessary and sufficient condition on the directed graph to ensure the synchronization error of all followers can be reduced small enough. Then, the distributed adaptive synchronization criterion is further explored because it is difficult to obtain the relative velocity measurements of the agents. The distributed adaptive synchronization criterion without the velocity measurement feedback is also designed to fulfill the current investigation. Finally, the simulation example is performed to verify the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed theoretical results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据