4.6 Article

Midlife omega-3 fatty acid intake predicts later life white matter microstructure in an age- and APOE-dependent manner

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 2143-2151

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac196

关键词

brain aging; brain microstructure; dietary patterns; diffusion MRI; omega-3 fatty acids; restriction spectrum imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that high omega-3 intake in midlife may help to maintain white matter (WM) integrity into older age, particularly in the latest decades of life and among APOE ε4 carriers.
Omega-3 intake has been positively associated with healthy brain aging, yet it remains unclear whether high omega-3 intake beginning early in life may optimize its protective effects against brain aging. We examined whether omega-3 intake is associated with brain microstructure over 2 decades later among dementia-free older adults. The 128 participants (62% women; age at magnetic resonance imaging: 76.6 +/- 7.9) from the Rancho Bernardo Study of Healthy Aging completed at least 1 dietary assessment between 1984 and 1996 and underwent restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) 22.8 +/- 3.1 years later. We evaluated associations between prior omega-3 intake and RSI metrics of gray and white matter (WM) microstructure. Higher prior omega-3 intake was associated with greater restricted diffusion in the superior cortico-striatal fasciculus. A correlation between higher prior omega-3 intake and greater cingulum restricted diffusion was stronger among participants >80 years old. Higher omega-3 intake correlated with greater restricted diffusion in the inferior longitudinal and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus more strongly for apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon 4 carriers than noncarriers. Associations were not modified by adjustment for dietary pattern, health, or lifestyle. High omega-3 intake in midlife may help to maintain WM integrity into older age, particularly in the latest decades of life and among APOE epsilon 4 carriers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据