4.1 Article

EFFECT OF CRYSTALLISATION TEMPERATURE ON LAS TRANSPARENT GLASS-CERAMICS CONTAINING A HIGH Al2O3 CONTENT

期刊

CERAMICS-SILIKATY
卷 66, 期 2, 页码 157-166

出版社

UNIV CHEMISTRY & TECHNOLOGY, PRAGUE
DOI: 10.13168/cs.2022.0010

关键词

Low thermal expansion coefficient; beta-quartz solid solution; the content of Al2O3; LAS transparent glass-ceramics

资金

  1. Center for Materials Research and Analysis, Wuhan University of Technology [2018KFJJ11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Influence of the crystallisation temperature on the structure and properties of Li2O-Al2O3-SiO2 (LAS) glass-ceramics with high aluminium content was investigated. Glass-ceramics with ultra-low CTE and high transmittance were successfully prepared by the melt-quenching method and a two-step heat treatment. The crystallisation behaviour of the glass was studied via DSC and XRD. Besides, FTIR, Raman and FE-SEM were used to explore the structure of the samples under different crystallisation temperatures. A beta-quartz solid solution with nano-size precipitated from the glass after the heat treatment and when the crystallisation temperature was 820 degrees C, the bending strength and microhardness reached 156 MPa and 1082.09 HV, respectively.
The influence of the crystallisation temperature on the structure and properties of Li2O-Al2O3-SiO2 (LAS) glass-ceramics with a high aluminium content was investigated. Glass-ceramics with ultra-low CTE and high transmittance were successfully prepared by the melt-quenching method and a two-step heat treatment. The crystallisation behaviour of the glass was studied via DSC and XRD. Besides, FTIR, Raman and FE-SEM were used to explore the structure of the samples under different crystallisation temperatures. The results showed that a beta-quartz solid solution with nano-size precipitated from the glass after the heat treatment and when the crystallisation temperature was 820 degrees C, the bending strength and microhardness reached 156 MPa and 1082.09 HV, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据