4.7 Article

Nanocomposite E(PbSnF4;SnF2)@SWCNT - Promising material for fluoride-ion batteries

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 18, 页码 26565-26574

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.352

关键词

Nanocomposites; Carbon nanotubes; Nanocrystals; Twin crystal; Fluoride-ion battery

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation within the State assignment Federal Scientific Research Centre Crystallography and Photonics of Russian Academy of Sciences
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation [RFMEFI62119X0035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates a nanocomposite material filled in the channels of single walled carbon nanotubes, and explores its various ordered and disordered nanostructures. The electrochemical performance of this nanocomposite is also examined.
The channels of single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) were filled with eutectic composition consisting of PbSnF4 and SnF2. The nanocomposite was investigated by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), X-ray energy dispersive (EDX) spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy. The SnF2 and PbSnF4 nanocrystals form independent regions with disordered atomic region between them inside the SWCNT with a diameter of 20.0(3) angstrom. In the PbSnF4 region there are two separate fragments connected by a twinning plane. Structural models of the PbSnF4 twin nanocrystal and SnF2 nanocrystal inside the nanotube with chilarity (26,0) were constructed and computer modelling of TEM-image of E(PbSnF4;SnF2)@SWCNT nanocomposite was performed. Solid-state FIB with Ce as anode, dispersed E(PbSnF4; SnF2)@SWCNT + SnF2 as a composite-cathode and 95.03%LaF3+4.97%BaF2 electrolyte was investigated by the impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. The current density reached similar to 0.6 A/m(2) at 180 degrees C, the open circuit voltage of the pellet at room temperature was 1.9 V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据