4.7 Article

Self-supported Li4Ti5O12 nanobelt array anode with long-life and improved low-temperature performance for flexible lithium-ion batteries

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 15, 页码 22153-22162

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.216

关键词

Self-supported; Nanbelt arrays; Lithium-ion battery; Low temperature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52072251]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET100605]
  3. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2018GZ0463]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel self-supported Li4Ti5O12 nanobelt array with high surface area and excellent performance has been successfully fabricated, showing great potential for high performance flexible energy storage devices, especially at low temperatures.
A novel self-supported Li4Ti5O12 nanobelt (LTONB) array is fabricated on the titanium foil by hydrothermal process and subsequent ion exchange. The nanobelts consist of thin nanoflakes and possess high surface area, and the addition of NaF induces a more controllable growth process. Typically, the self-supported Li4Ti5O12 nanobelt array on Ti substrate (LTONB@Ti) with an array height of 7 mu m and a specific surface area of 139.1 m2 g-1 exhibits much enhanced specific area capacity, excellent cycling and low temperature performance as a LIB anode. At room temperature, it delivers a discharge areal capacity of 0.293 mAh cm-2 at 0.1 mA cm-2. After 1000 cycles at 1 mA cm-2, the capacity retention rate reaches 92.7%. The LTONB@Ti electrode also displays good low-temperature adaptability and can retain 60% room temperature-capacity even under -30 degrees C. It delivers a capacity of 0.138 mAh cm-2 at -20 degrees C (1 mA cm-2) with a stable discharge platform voltage of 1.32 V, and the corresponding capacity retention rate reaches 95.65% after 100 cycles. This is very promising for future potential application in high performance flexible energy storage devices operating over a wide temperature range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据