4.7 Article

Influence of Al on the structure and ion transport in garnet-type Li7La3-xAlxZr2O12 solid electrolytes for Li-ion batteries

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 19, 页码 29238-29246

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.199

关键词

Li7La3Zr2O12; Solid electrolyte; Impedance spectroscopy; Cubic phase

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Germany
  2. UGC-DAE-CRS, Govt. of India [UDCRS/MUM/AO/CRS-M-310]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work focuses on the preparation and characterization of Al-doped garnet-type Li7La3-xAlxZr2O12 electrolytes for solid-state Li-ion batteries. The electrical properties of the materials were evaluated, and the results indicate an increasing trend in ionic conductivity, DC conductivity, hopping rates, and diffusion coefficient with increasing temperature.
This work reports on the preparation of garnet-type Al-doped Li7La3-xAlxZr2O12 (x = 0, 0.1, and 0.2) electrolytes for solid-state Li-ion batteries. The undoped and Al-doped cubic phase LLZO has been synthesized by conventional solid-state mixing and annealing at 1000 degrees C for 2 h. The prepared materials have been characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy. The electrical properties were evaluated by impedance spectroscopy at varies temperatures. The ionic conductivities of Li7La3Zr2O12, Li7La2.9Al0.1Zr2O12, and Li7La2.8Al0.2Zr2O12 were determined to be 1.8x10(-6), 4.1x10(-6), and 6.5x10(-6) S cm(-1) at 100 degrees C respectively and their activation energy has been derived as 0.70, 0.69 and 0.73 eV from the Arrhenius plot. The DC conductivities were calculated as 1.6x10(-4), 3.3x10(-4), and 5.7x10(-4) S cm(-1) for Li7La3Zr2O12, Li7La2.9Al0.1Zr2O12, and Li7La2.8Al0.2Zr2O12 respectively. Furthermore, the hopping rates, charge carrier concentration, ionic mobility, and diffusion coefficient were also calculated and the results show an increasing trend with increasing temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据