4.7 Article

The mechanical and repair behavior of damaged carbon/carbon composites

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 16, 页码 22759-22766

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.076

关键词

C; C composites; Cracks; Defect repair; Flexural strength

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52061135102, 51872239]
  2. Innovation Talent Promotion Plan of Shaanxi Province for Science and Technology Innovation Team [2020TD-003]
  3. General Project (Youth) of Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Basic Research Program [2020JQ-170]
  4. Young Talents for Science and Technology Association - Shaanxi Province [20200406]
  5. Fund of Key Laboratory of National Defense Science and Technology in Northwestern Polytechnical University [JCKYS2020607003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the impact of defect types on the mechanical performance of carbon/carbon (C/C) composites. Results showed that prefabricated defects significantly reduced the flexural strength of C/C composites. However, by using a Ni-based solder additive for defect repair, the stress concentration decreased and the flexural strength was improved.
With the aim of understanding the effect of defect types on the mechanical performance of carbon/carbon (C/C) composites, three kinds of defects such as circle arc, square, and triangle shapes were prefabricated on their surfaces. The results show that the prefabricated defects damage the flexural strength of C/C composites compared to the pristine sample (101 +/- 6 MPa). The flexural strength of C/C decreased by 30.84%, 45.84%, and 42.58% corresponding to the circle arc, square, and triangle type defects respectively. The defect-repair method with Ni-based solder as the additive was employed to repair the damaged C/C composites. After repair, the stress concentration of C/C composites decreases, and there is a good connection between carbon fiber and the repaired solder so that the load can be transferred continuously, therefore the flexural strength of C/C composites can be improved by 20-28%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据