4.7 Article

Effects of carbon nanotube dosage and aggregate size distribution on mechanical property and microstructure of cemented rockfill

期刊

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104408

关键词

Cemented rockfill; Recycled aggregate; Carbon nanotube; Mechanical property; Microstructure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52004272, 51734009, 52061135111, 52074259, 52074268, 51904290, 52174092]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200660]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the mechanical properties and microstructure of cemented rockfill reinforced by carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and fractal aggregates. The study reveals the strengthening and deterioration mechanisms of CNT dosage on cemented rockfill, as well as the influence of aggregate size distribution.
The mechanical and structural properties of cemented rockfill produced by mineral wastes as recycled aggregates limit its application. In this paper, the macroscopic mechanical and microscopic scanning tests were carried out to study the mechanical property and microstructure of cemented rockfill reinforced by carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and fractal aggregates. The strengthening and deterioration mechanisms of CNT dosage on cemented rockfill were revealed for systematically evaluating its engineering availability. The influencing mechanism of aggregate size distribution on cemented rockfill was clarified to analyze the contribution of optimizing aggregate size distribution. The results show that the strengthening of cemented rockfill by appropriate CNTs includes bridging microcracks, compacting micropores and reinforcing cemented matrix, while the deterioration by excessive CNTs is attributed to form the agglomerative clusters and hollow cemented matrices. The cemented rockfill with su-perior aggregate size distribution has uniform and dense microstructure with relatively few defects, which is conducive to CNT reinforcement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据