4.7 Article

Long-term antibiotic exposure promotesmortality after systemic fungal infection by driving lymphocyte dysfunction and systemic escape of commensal bacteria

期刊

CELL HOST & MICROBE
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 1020-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.04.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Division of Intramural Research of the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Disease
  2. National Human Genome Research Institute
  3. National Cancer Institute
  4. NIH Clinical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotics increase susceptibility to invasive candidiasis by impairing antifungal immunity and increasing the risk of systemic bacterial co-infection. Vancomycin has a similar effect by reducing the frequency of Th17 cells in the gut. In humans, antibiotics are associated with an increased risk of invasive candidiasis and death.
Antibiotics are a modifiable iatrogenic risk factor for the most common human nosocomial fungal infection, invasive candidiasis, yet the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. We found that antibiotics enhanced the susceptibility to murine invasive candidiasis due to impaired lymphocyte-dependent IL-17A- and GM- CSFmediated antifungal immunity within the gut. This led to non-inflammatory bacterial escape and systemic bacterial co-infection, which could be ameliorated by IL-17A or GM-CSF immunotherapy. Vancomycin alone similarly enhanced the susceptibility to invasive fungal infection and systemic bacterial co-infection. Mechanistically, vancomycin reduced the frequency of gut Th17 cells associated with impaired proliferation and RORgt expression. Vancomycin's effects on Th17 cells were indirect, manifesting only in vivo in the presence of dysbiosis. In humans, antibiotics were associated with an increased risk of invasive candidiasis and death after invasive candidiasis. Our work highlights the importance of antibiotic stewardship in protecting vulnerable patients from life-threatening infections and provides mechanistic insights into a controllable iatrogenic risk factor for invasive candidiasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据