4.7 Article

Catechol modification of non-woven chitosan gauze for enhanced hemostatic efficacy

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 286, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119319

关键词

Chitosan; Hemostasis; Gauze; Catechol; Wettability

资金

  1. Social Development of Instructive Program of Fujian Province [2020Y0020]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [22175037, 52103108]
  3. Key Project for Advancing Science and Technology of Fujian Province [[2021] 415-2021G02005]
  4. Program for Innovative Research Team in Science and Technology in Fujian Province University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel chitosan-catechol hemostatic gauze with impressive hemostatic performance on rat injuries has been developed through surface modification, demonstrating biodegradability and non-cytotoxicity while integrating three structure and function effects.
Development of efficient hemostatic gauze is critical to increasing survival rate by quick bleeding control of life-threatening hemorrhage. Herein, a novel chitosan non-woven hemostatic gauze is made by slightly surface modification with a special catechol compound, i.e. 3-(9,11,13-pentadecatrienyl)-1,2-benzenediol with a long side hydrophobic alkyl chain. Its wettability, interaction with red blood cell and platelet, and hemostatic efficacy on rat injuries are evaluated. This chitosan-catechol gauze demonstrates impressive hemostatic performances on rat femoral artery and liver laceration injury models (blood loss of this modified chitosan gauze is less than 17% of that of pristine chitosan gauze). Additionally, it is biodegradable, and maintains non-cytotoxicity. It integrates three structure and function effects together, i.e., anchoring effect between catechol and tissue, blood repelling effect from hydrophobic alkyl chain, and blood wicking effect from hydrophilic chitosan. Therefore, a new hemostatic mechanism is proposed for the excellent hemostatic potentials of this chitosan gauze.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据