4.7 Article

Characterization of a polysaccharide hydrogel with high elasticity produced by a mutant strain Sphingomonas sanxanigenens NX03

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.119030

关键词

Microbial polysaccharide; Rheological properties; High elasticity; Micro-aerobic culture; Temperature-sensitive property; Texture profile analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31900050, U2003128]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M641629]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFC1808602]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study characterizes a new mutant strain and its polysaccharide product, Hesan, which exhibits high elasticity and temperature sensitivity and can be efficiently produced through micro-aerobic static culture.
Microbial polysaccharides as renewable biopmducts have attracted lots of attention in various industries. Hesan (Highly elastic Sanxan), an exopolysaccharide produced by a plasma mutagenic strain Sphingomonas sanxanigenens NX03, was characterized. It possessed the same monosaccharide composition as the original polysaccharide Sanxan produced from wild-type strain NX02, but significantly reduced acetyl and glyceryl contents. Textural analysis showed the springiness and cohesiveness of Hesan gel was much higher than Sanxan gel, and rheological behaviors indicated it possessed a lower loss factor, and its conformational transition temperatures at different concentrations were obviously lower than Sanxan gel and high-acyl gellan gel, which suggested that Hesan gel was highly elastic and temperature-sensitive. Additionally, Hesan gel could be efficiently produced through micro-aerobic static culture in shallow (10.46 +/- 0.30 g/L) and deep liquids (3.21 +/- 0.32 g/L), which was significantly different from the fermentation of other water-soluble polysaccharides. In short, this study characterizes a new mutant strain and its polysaccharide products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据