4.1 Article

Treatments, resource utilization, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients presenting to emergency departments across pandemic waves: an observational study by the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN)

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 397-407

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s43678-022-00275-3

关键词

COVID-19; coronavirus disease 2019; SARS-COV-2; resource utilization; patient outcomes; pandemic waves

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [447679]
  2. Ontario Ministry of Colleges and Universities [C-655-2129]
  3. Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation [5357]
  4. Genome BC [COV024]
  5. Fondation du CHU de Quebec [4007]
  6. BC Academic Health Science Network
  7. BioTalent Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares the treatment, acute care utilization, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients in emergency departments during different pandemic waves. The findings suggest that evidence-based therapies were more widely adopted in the second wave, leading to reduced use of experimental therapies. Additionally, there was an increase in ED discharges and a decrease in hospital and critical care resource utilization over time, without an associated increase in mortality.
Background Treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) evolved between pandemic waves. Our objective was to compare treatments, acute care utilization, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients presenting to emergency departments (ED) across pandemic waves. Methods This observational study enrolled consecutive eligible COVID-19 patients presenting to 46 EDs participating in the Canadian COVID-19 ED Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) between March 1 and December 31, 2020. We collected data by retrospective chart review. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included treatments, hospital and ICU admissions, ED revisits and readmissions. Logistic regression modeling assessed the impact of pandemic wave on outcomes. Results We enrolled 9,967 patients in 8 provinces, 3,336 from the first and 6,631 from the second wave. Patients in the second wave were younger, fewer met criteria for severe COVID-19, and more were discharged from the ED. Adjusted for patient characteristics and disease severity, steroid use increased (odds ratio [OR] 7.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2-8.9), and invasive mechanical ventilation decreased (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.7) in the second wave compared to the first. After adjusting for differences in patient characteristics and disease severity, the odds of hospitalization (OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.6-0.8) and critical care admission (OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.6-0.9) decreased, while mortality remained unchanged (OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-1.1). Interpretation In patients presenting to cute care facilities, we observed rapid uptake of evidence-based therapies and less use of experimental therapies in the second wave. We observed increased rates of ED discharges and lower hospital and critical care resource use over time. Substantial reductions in mechanical ventilation were not associated with increasing mortality. Advances in treatment strategies created health system efficiencies without compromising patient outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据