4.5 Article

Experimental investigation and thermodynamic re-assessment of the Ti-Zn system and atomic mobility of its bcc phase

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.calphad.2022.102392

关键词

Ti-Zn; Thermodynamics; Ab initio calculations; Diffusion; CALPHAD

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52071339, 51971235]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detailed thermodynamic and kinetic descriptions of the Ti-Zn system are crucial for the design of titanium alloys. This study revisited the Ti-Zn system through experimental and computational investigations, providing valuable data for understanding phase equilibria and calculating thermodynamic properties.
Detailed thermodynamic and kinetic descriptions of the Ti-Zn system are of especial significance for designing novel titanium alloys. However, there are still inconsistencies between the literature data and the existing phase diagram of the Ti-Zn system. Besides, little report about the kinetics of the Ti-Zn system is available. In the present work, the Ti-Zn system has been revisited via experimental, ab initio and CALPHAD (CALculation of PHAse Diagrams)-type investigations with a thermodynamic database being in good agreement with experimental information. A Ti/Zn diffusion couple and a Zn-rich equilibrated alloy were employed to contribute to the knowledge of the phase equilibria at 500 degrees C and 600 degrees C. The formation enthalpies of the intermetallic Ti-Zn compounds were computed via ab initio calculations, while those of body-centered cubic (bcc) and hexagonalclose packed (hcp) phases were obtained with the special quasirandom structure (SQS) method. In addition, another diffusion couple of bcc Ti/Ti-3at.% Zn was assembled and annealed at 900 degrees C and 1100 degrees C respectively for 72h to extract interdiffusion coefficients. Based on the newly developed thermodynamic description in this work and our experimental results, the atomic mobility parameters of the bcc phase for the Ti-Zn system were assessed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据