4.7 Article

Satellite-Based Characterization of Convection and Impacts from the Catastrophic 10 August 2020 Midwest US Derecho

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
卷 103, 期 4, 页码 E1172-E1196

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0023.1

关键词

Derecho; Remote sensing; Agriculture; Satellite observations; Societal impacts; Lightning

资金

  1. NASA Applied Sciences Disasters Program [18-DISASTER18-0008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper documented the complex evolution of the catastrophic derecho using various satellite sensors and weather radar observations. It also showed that SAR improved the identification and quantification of damaged crops. The study estimated that the derecho caused approximately 1.97 million acres of damaged corn and 1.40 million acres of damaged soybeans in Iowa.
The catastrophic derecho that occurred on 10 August 2020 across the midwestern United States caused billions of dollars of damage to both urban and rural infrastructure as well as agricultural crops, most notably across the state of Iowa. This paper documents the complex evolution of the derecho through the use of low-Earth-orbit passive-microwave imager and GOES-16 satellite-derived products complemented by products derived from NEXRAD weather radar observations. Additional satellite sensors including optical imagers and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) were used to observe impacts to the power grid and agriculture in Iowa. SAR improved the identification and quantification of damaged corn and soybeans, as compared to true-color composites and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). A statistical approach to identify damaged corn and soybean crops from SAR was created with estimates of 1.97 million acres of damaged corn and 1.40 million acres of damaged soybeans in the state of Iowa. The damage estimates generated by this study were comparable to estimates produced by others after the derecho, including two commercial agricultural companies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据