4.7 Review

Unveiling the actual progress of Digital Building Permit: Getting awareness through a critical state of the art review

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 213, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108854

关键词

Digital building permit; BIM; GIS; GeoBIM; Compliance checking; Rule checking

资金

  1. European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [707404]
  2. FIG (International Federation of Surveyors) Foundation, The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper critically analyzes the literature to uncover the latest developments in Digital Building Permitting (DBP). The research shows that the main aspects addressed in the digitalization of building permit process are the technology and regulations. However, there are areas for improvement such as officer involvement, scalability of solutions, and data interoperability.
Growing interest is awarded to the digitalization of the building permitting use case and many works are developed about the topic. However, the subject is very complex and many aspects are usually tackled separately, making it very hard for traditional literature reviews to grasp the actual progress in the overall topic. This paper unveils the detailed state of the art in Digital Building Permitting (DBP) by critically analysing the literature by means of a set of coding tags (research progress, implementation, affected DBP workflow steps, ambitions addressed) assigned by a multidisciplinary team. The executed research shows that the mainly addressed aspects of the digitalization of building permit process are the technologies to check the compliance of design proposals against regulations, followed by the digitalization of regulations. Improvable aspects identified in the entire building permit system are instead e.g. the involvement of officers, scalability of solutions and interoperability of data, intended both as data validation and as integration of geospatial data with building models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据