4.7 Article

Numerical study of the human walking-induced fine particles resuspension

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109050

关键词

Indoor air quality; Particle resuspension; Shoe groove pattern; Induced airflow; Walking speed; Particle-substrate combination

资金

  1. La Rochelle CDA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study numerically investigated particle resuspension induced by walking, showing that the resuspension fraction increases with particle size and walking speed. However, no significant influence of shoe groove patterns was observed.
One of the main sources of pollution in indoor environments is human walking-induced particle resuspension. In this work, the airflow and resuspension of particles smaller than 1 mu m generated by foot tapping were investigated numerically using ANSYS CFX software. The k-co shear stress transport model was considered to simulate the unsteady airflow field around and under the shoe. The immersed solid method was then used to incorporate the shoe in a three-dimensional computational domain. Particle resuspension was predicted by means of the Rock 'n' Roll model. The effects of the walking speed and shoe groove pattern (transverse grooves, longitudinal grooves and no groove) were studied. Three different selected particle-substrate combinations (ATD-linoleum, PSL-linoleum and alumina-steel) were tested. The numerical simulations showed that the air below the foot was ejected as a high velocity jet. After the shoe hit the ground, counterrotating vortices were formed around the shoe. The results of particle resuspension were compared with previous experimental works, and good agreement was found. Results shown that for the different studied cases the resuspension fraction ranges over four orders of magnitude, from 10(-5) to 10(-1). Particle resuspension fractions increased with particle size and walking speed. However, no significant influence of the shoe groove patterns was observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据