4.4 Article

Colchicine for COVID-19 in the community (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial

期刊

出版社

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0083

关键词

colchicine; community; COVID-19; primary health care; randomised controlled trial

资金

  1. NIHR and its Clinical Research Network, NHS DigiTrials, Public Health England, Health and Care Research Wales, NHS Research Scotland
  2. Health and Social Care Board in Northern Ireland
  3. Therapeutics Task Force

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to determine the effects of colchicine on recovery time and hospitalization/death related to COVID-19. The results showed that colchicine did not reduce recovery time or decrease the risk of hospitalization/death related to COVID-19 among participants in the community.
Background Cold wine has been proposed as a COVID-19 treatment. Aim To determine whether colchicine reduces time to recovery and COVID-19-related admissions to hospital and/or deaths among people in the community. Design and setting Prospective, multicentre, open-label, multi-arm, randomised, controlled. adaptive platform trial (PRINCIPLE). Method Adults aged >= 65 years or >= 18 years with comorbidities or shortness of breath, and unwell for <= 14 days with suspected COVID-19 in the community, were randomised to usual care, usual care plus colchicine (500 mu g daily for 14 days), or usual aim plus other interventions. The co-primary endpoints were time to first self-reported recovery and admission to hospital/death related to COVID-19, within 28 days, analysed using Bayesian models. Results The trial opened on 2 April 2020. Randomisation to colchicine started on 4 March 2021 and stopped on 26 May 2021 because the pre-specified time to recovery futility criterion was met. I he primary analysis model included 2755 participants who were SARS-CoV-2 positive. randomised to colchicine (n = 156), usual care (n = 1145), and other treatments (n = 1454). Time to first self-reported recovery was similar- in the colchicine group compared with usual care with an estimated hazard ratio of 0.92(95% credible interval (CrI) = 0.72 to 1.16) and an estimated increase of 1.4 days in median time to self reported recovery for colchicine versus usual care. The probability of meaningful benefit in time to recovery was very low at 1.8%. COVID-19-related admissions to hospital/deaths were similar in the colchicine group versus usual care, with an estimated odds ratio of 0.76 (95% CrI = 0.28 to 1.89) and an estimated difference of -0.4%(95% CrI = -2.7 to 2.4). Conclusion Colchicine did not improve time to recovery in people at higher risk of complications with COVID-19 in the community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据