4.6 Review

The parietal lobe evolution and the emergence of material culture in the human genus

期刊

BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION
卷 228, 期 1, 页码 145-167

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-022-02487-w

关键词

Parietal cortex; Evolutionary anthropology; Comparative neuroanatomy; Tool use; Artifacts construction; Tool apraxia; Constructional apraxia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional and new disciplines suggest that the parietal lobe underwent considerable expansion during human evolution. Various studies have shown increased globularity of the braincase and bulging of the parietal region in modern humans compared to other human species. The parietal cortex is believed to play a significant role in human-specific behaviors related to visuospatial capacity, technological integration, self-awareness, numerosity, mathematical reasoning, and language.
Traditional and new disciplines converge in suggesting that the parietal lobe underwent a considerable expansion during human evolution. Through the study of endocasts and shape analysis, paleoneurology has shown an increased globularity of the braincase and bulging of the parietal region in modern humans, as compared to other human species, including Neandertals. Cortical complexity increased in both the superior and inferior parietal lobules. Emerging fields bridging archaeology and neuroscience supply further evidence of the involvement of the parietal cortex in human-specific behaviors related to visuospatial capacity, technological integration, self-awareness, numerosity, mathematical reasoning and language. Here, we complement these inferences on the parietal lobe evolution, with results from more classical neuroscience disciplines, such as behavioral neurophysiology, functional neuroimaging, and brain lesions; and apply these to define the neural substrates and the role of the parietal lobes in the emergence of functions at the core of material culture, such as tool-making, tool use and constructional abilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据