4.7 Article

The heat is on: a simple method to increase genome editing efficiency in plants

期刊

BMC PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-022-03519-7

关键词

CRISPR; Plant biotechnology; Genome engineering; Heat-shock; Base editing; Homology-directed repair

资金

  1. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO) [12T3418N, BOF20/PDO/016, 3G038719]
  2. Ghent University [12T3418N, BOF20/PDO/016, BOFMET2015000201]
  3. EU through Erasmus+ grants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a simplified heat stress assay that can effectively increase the mutagenesis efficiency of CRISPR in plants and in some cases improve the recovery of mutant progeny.
Background Precision genome mutagenesis using CRISPR/Cas has become the standard method to generate mutant plant lines. Several improvements have been made to increase mutagenesis efficiency, either through vector optimisation or the application of heat stress. Results Here, we present a simplified heat stress assay that can be completed in six days using commonly-available laboratory equipment. We show that three heat shocks (3xHS) efficiently increases indel efficiency of LbCas12a and Cas9, irrespective of the target sequence or the promoter used to express the nuclease. The generated indels are primarily somatic, but for three out of five targets we demonstrate that up to 25% more biallelic mutations are transmitted to the progeny when heat is applied compared to non-heat controls. We also applied our heat treatment to lines containing CRISPR base editors and observed a 22-27% increase in the percentage of C-to-T base editing. Furthermore, we test the effect of 3xHS on generating large deletions and a homologous recombination reporter. Interestingly, we observed no positive effect of 3xHS treatment on either approach using our conditions. Conclusions Together, our experiments show that heat treatment is consistently effective at increasing the number of somatic mutations using many CRISPR approaches in plants and in some cases can increase the recovery of mutant progeny.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据