4.5 Article

Do different foot types affect the 6-min walk test capacity of younths with Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy ?

期刊

BMC PEDIATRICS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03338-7

关键词

Gait capacity; Childhood; Foot posture; Hereditary motor sensory neuropathy; Timed function tests

资金

  1. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) [308073/2015-0]
  2. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil)
  3. PUB-USP (Unified Scholarship Program for Undergraduate Students - University of Sao Paulo)
  4. FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the gait capacity of youths with Charcot Marie Tooth disease (CMT) and used different foot postures as a grouping variable. The results showed that gait performance was decreased in the CMT group compared to the non-CMT group. Contrary to expectations, the cavus foot type did not show lower gait capacity than the flatfoot.
Background: The present study aimed to assess the gait capacity of youths with Charcot Marie Tooth disease (CMT), considering the different foot postures as a grouping variable. Methods: The total distance, the predicted distance, and gait velocity obtained during the six-minute walking test (6MWT) were compared between participants with and without CMT. In addition, part of the CMT group completed a 12-month follow-up. The study evaluated 63 participants (CMT group = 31; Non-CMT group = 32) aged 6 to 18, both sexes. Data included anthropometric measures, foot posture index (FPI), the distance (D6), percentage of predicted distance (%D6), and walking velocity(V) in 6MWT. Results: The D6% presented no significant difference between the types of feet in CMT or Non-CMT (p < 0.05, Kruskal Wallis test). CMT presented reduced values of D6, %D6, and V when compared to Non-CMT. Conclusions: These findings indicate that gait performance was decreased in youths with CMT in comparison to non-CMT. Contrary to what was expected, the cavus foot type did not show lower gait capacity than the flatfoot, suggesting that the types of feet alone did not determine differences in gait capacity within the CMT group

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据